{"id":1901,"date":"2014-09-28T01:32:22","date_gmt":"2014-09-28T01:32:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/?p=1901"},"modified":"2024-06-20T05:25:22","modified_gmt":"2024-06-20T05:25:22","slug":"rcl-notes-of-september-9-2014-planning-board-meeting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/?p=1901","title":{"rendered":"RCL notes of September 9, 2014 Planning Board Meeting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\"><br \/>\n<html><body><\/p>\n<p>Planning Board meeting Sept 9, 2014 -&Acirc;&nbsp;selected items&Acirc;&nbsp;with time stamps<\/p>\n<p><strong>243 Central Rd (3:38)<\/strong> &#8211; Altus engineering representing owner Dan&Acirc;&nbsp; Philbrick proposal to demo existing building and replace with two story building for single or mixed office use;&Acirc;&nbsp; new building would be closer to road with parking in back&Acirc;&nbsp; (3:38)<\/p>\n<p>Discussion:<\/p>\n<p>14:00 &#8211; Flexibility of business use depending on demand; water issues, snow storage run off, etc.<\/p>\n<p>19:52 &#8211; Pl Bd. member questions<\/p>\n<p>22:55 &#8211; public comments, proposed parking lot next to wetlands, Conservation commission not involved early in process<\/p>\n<p>28:00 &#8211; Con Com. chair Sally King speaks<\/p>\n<p>34:00 &#8211; waivers requested<\/p>\n<p>38:20 &#8211; Pl. Bd. grants approval of application with conditions<\/p>\n<p>45:00 &#8211; &Acirc;&nbsp;PB member Roman expresses her concerns &#8211; wetlands etc.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>561 South Rd(Rye Farm)&Acirc;&nbsp; (53:00)&Acirc;&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Note:&Acirc;&nbsp; Chairman Epperson recused himself prior to presentation, discussion between PB and member of the public about intent of builder,&Acirc;&nbsp; beyond the current proposal, to have an RCD in the back land acreage of the property.<\/p>\n<p>Chair Winslow says that is not in the application for this meeting and will not be discussed.<\/p>\n<p>55:00&Acirc;&nbsp;&Acirc;&nbsp;&#8211; &Acirc;&nbsp;Proposed major&Acirc;&nbsp;five lot subdivision &#8211; builder DD Cook and his engineer present; lot&Acirc;&nbsp;#1 will retain the current farm house and barn plus four new house lots in back<\/p>\n<p>1:00:00 -&Acirc;&nbsp; after applicant provides many materials to PB, member Tweedie moves to have meeting continued to October so members can have time to study the documents.&Acirc;&nbsp; Applicant is given time to update the board on changes made to&Acirc;&nbsp;plan since the last meeting&Acirc;&nbsp;(driveways, drainage, entry road, etc.)<\/p>\n<p>1:13:00 &#8211; &Acirc;&nbsp;lot #5 is 27.5 acres&Acirc;&nbsp;(if there is a future application for an RCD it would&Acirc;&nbsp;be subdivided&Acirc;&nbsp;from this lot)<\/p>\n<p>main entry road &#8211; line of sight<\/p>\n<p>driveways<\/p>\n<p>setback<\/p>\n<p>septic systems<\/p>\n<p>Atty. Donovan&#8217;s comments addressed<\/p>\n<p>soil quality<\/p>\n<p>utilities<\/p>\n<p>rain garden<\/p>\n<p>ground water run off from lot #3<\/p>\n<p>traffic volume<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1:35:30 &#8211; Member Low expresses concerns about wetlands, pumping sewage near wetlands, wildlife corridor, protecting back lands in the&Acirc;&nbsp;back land parcel of the property ( part of lot #5)<\/p>\n<p>1:38:30 &#8211; Public comments:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; member of Rye Water district expresses concerns about proximity of property to town aquifer<\/p>\n<p>-495 South Rd resident &#8211; rain garden, detention pond, run off into wet lands<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Abutter to property expressed concerns about run off from lot #3 onto her property; she posed many technical questions that will have to be researched and addressed later<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Sally King of Con. Com spoke<\/p>\n<p>2:01:01&Acirc;&nbsp;&Acirc;&nbsp; another South Rd resident spoke about the larger impact on creating a development next to the wetlands and how it will impact the whole ecosystem all the way to the ocean resident of 565 South Rd &#8211; expressed concerns about how wet the proposed building area is which he has witnessed for over 50 years<\/p>\n<p>2:07:00 &#8211; public comments closed and PB discussion ensues: &Acirc;&nbsp;vote to accept jurisdiction of the application including a 590 ft. town road to access the development, set up escrow account,&Acirc;&nbsp;schedule site walk on 9\/15\/14&Acirc;&nbsp; and the meeting will be continued until the site walk<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p><strong>PB discusses Rules of Procedure<\/strong> <strong>(2:20:40)<\/strong> &#8211; a mistake is acknowledged in the process by which the&Acirc;&nbsp; 2012 PB approved changes to the 2012 &Acirc;&nbsp;Rules<\/p>\n<p>2:22:30 &#8211; member of public Steven Borne speaks about confusion of the public in reviewing Rules of procedure since 1998<\/p>\n<p>2:25:00 &#8211; spirited discussion with Chair Epperson<\/p>\n<p>2:26:30 &#8211; members of the public Dominique Winebaum reviews the history of the Rules and the work done by PB member Martin Zivic in 2009;&Acirc;&nbsp; she questioned the manner in which the current PB has changed the rules<\/p>\n<p>2:34:00 &#8211; PB member Ray Tweedie responds defending his actions<\/p>\n<p>2:40:00 &#8211; discussion between PB member Roman and PB planner Kim Reed<\/p>\n<p>Members of public Sam and Dominique Winebaum continue to give input about need to clean up the process.&Acirc;&nbsp; Residents Steven Borne and Peter Crawford continue the discussion<\/p>\n<p>2:54:00 &#8211; PB agrees that the public input has been heard and acknowledged and that a review of the Rules of Procedure is in order<\/p>\n<p>2:57:00 -&Acirc;&nbsp;continued discussion between the PB and the public<\/p>\n<p>3:11 &#8211; Adjourn<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Planning Board meeting Sept 9, 2014 -&Acirc;&nbsp;selected items&Acirc;&nbsp;with time stamps 243 Central Rd (3:38) &#8211; Altus engineering representing owner Dan&Acirc;&nbsp; Philbrick proposal to demo existing building and replace with two story building for single or mixed office use;&Acirc;&nbsp; new building would be closer to road with parking in back&Acirc;&nbsp; (3:38) Discussion: 14:00 &#8211; Flexibility of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77,57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-planning-board","category-town-meetings"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1901"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1901\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1903,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1901\/revisions\/1903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ryecivicleague.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}